The martial art around center-grip round shield and could we reconstruct it?
The Martial Art around center-grip shields
The center-grip round shield was used in Europe for over a millennium. From Roman parma to vikings and even further, if one counts bucklers of later periods. The size of the shield and the context of usage varies, but the basic form of the center-grip shield remained the same from the Roman infantryman to Charlemagne's knights and late viking warriors.
Weapons that were used with a parma were spear, lance, javelin, and sword (gladius or spatha). The original Roman parma was round in shape and most likely 90 cm in diameter. Quite similar to the largest viking age shields. It was first used by light skirmishing javelineers on foot (velites), as well as by cavalry lancers (equites) in the Roman Republican period. The origins of the shield can be found in the Hellenistic period, and the Romans copied it from the Greeks, who used it for similar purposes, especially by Hellenistic cavalry. Even though the main shield of the legionary became the scutum (first oval, then square), the parma maintained its role as the shield of the cavalry and auxiliary infantry. The parma changed its shape from round to oval somewhere between the late Republic and the early Imperial era. Late Roman infantry shields were again oval, but convex in shape too. All these shields had the unifying feature of center-grip on them.
Museum Het Valkhof in Nijmegen (Gelderland). Imperial Roman auxiliary cavalryman with a flat oval parma shield. |
As time went on, parma remained. The migration era and the viking age both show us that the round center-grip shield seemed to be the most used form of shield in Europe for the time. Mostly round, sometimes slightly oval, sometimes convex, and sometimes having metal edging, sometimes not. The umbo was most often metal, but wooden examples exist. The shield was always paired with a spear or a javelin and a side arm like a sword or axe. Often dagger or knife as a last resort, or just as a handy tool to be part of a warrior's equipment.
The weapons varied in style more than the shield seems to have. Spears vary in length and in purpose, from long and strong to specialised javelins like ango, and everything in between. Sword length lived between 1 meter long spathae and shortest gladii that were only 60cm long. The longest seaxes of the viking period have been longer than the shortest gladii.
The martial art of round shield fighting has thus lived for more than a millennium (Of course it is much more than a millennium. Check this out: Bronze age shield) with varying weaponry and with varying shield construction traditions. This all can in my (Arttu) opinion be put under a similar kind of context and similar kind of martial context and art. Especially if we look at single combat.
Recreation of a centergrip shield martial art
The goal of recreating round shield fighting has been an endeavor of pioneers like Roland Warzecha, and as his context, he has used the viking period. To be able to use literary sources he used a later fencing manual called I.33, but also the viking sagas to learn about the use of weapons. Another example of people recreating this type of fighting is Rolf Warming from The Society for Combat Archaeology, as he has been traveling around teaching active shield use to reenactors and martial artists. Roland uses a very intelligent and safe method of slowed-down fighting that allows fighters to use sharp weapons and shield reconstructions of high quality with reasonable safety. Rolf uses a training system from escrima where one learns a sequence and then trains it separately. This is also relatively safe and allows a high speed of movement and correct generation of force.
As I (Arttu) feel both methods above are needed and offer different benefits. The method used in HEMA competitions is also needed. In early days of HEMA people realised that just training the the art as learned from manuals is not enough, but the interpretations need to be tested in a competative environment with full speed and force being a factor. To achieve this we need to use training weapons that are safe enough to be used with protective gear in a full-speed competetive scenario. Thus far the problem has been that there is no right kind of equipment available. The biggest problem here is the shield. While it is evidently easy enough to build a training sword that does not break a fencing mask, we have the problem that shield boards made out of wood don't bend enough not to break the mask and face of my training partner. Also, the neck and collar bones are easily injured when the shield is used actively.
Inventing the tool
As an attempt to solve the issue of shield board being too dangerous as an offensive weapon, I first built two training shields out of rubber. I gave them a wooden handle and a cheap metal boss. I also made them a metal frame similar to some African shields I had seen. These work quite well and were good enough to use with a fencing mask. The rubber would not break one's bones and the metal structure was somewhat bendy to add safety.
My plan for a rubber shield with frame number 2. |
I didn't mind they were ugly. I loved them. |
They are prettyyyyy ❤๐งก๐๐๐ |
Lancea on the left. Arttu's rubber spearhead on the right. A small javelinhead photo bombing in the middle. (I should take a better picture later.) |
Even though these are the best, some people will want swords and that's fine. |
For swords, there are a lot of options like this one: https://blackfencer.com/en/one-handed-swords-synthetic/104-viking-.html. I haven't tested that one but it seems OK. It even has a sharp simulator option that makes it better. Then there is this cool thing I can't afford, but it seems amazing: https://www.arms-n-armor.com/products/viking-trainer
Now we can fight (and compete?)
https://www.academia.edu/31615328/Roland_Warzecha_Form_folgt_Funktion_Das_Schwert_Symbol_und_Waffe_s_153_161
Tested fighting gear that we use on videos. ( The knife needs an update :D ) |
I can testify (as the designer of the V1 viking sword from BlackFencer) that it's great (of a bit light, but for a synthetic trainer that's fine), when ordering one has to specify for a short handle though because they have catered to the wishes of uneducated customers who were complaining about the grip length. The "sharp simulator" is great for blade-on-blade contact, but it probably wouldn't work that well with shield edges or spear shafts. The Arms&Armor sword designed by Roland looks excessively light for a steel sword.
ReplyDeleteWhat kind of rubber do you used for your spear tips, that seems awesome! As for the shields, you should make a pair of transparent one for instructor purposes ;)
Transparent shields would be ... fun. As the sharp simulators works on blade on blade contact, perhaps there could be a modification on shield edges and surfaces to make em work. The dussacs we use now work really well. They are not perfect for any sword for any period, but just the ability to use them quite like sharps is worth it for us now.
Delete